The Leading eBooks Store Online
for your Apple or Android device, Nook, Kobo, PC, Mac, Sony Reader...
Complex Integrated Accounting Systems And Auditing
Add to cart
US$ 199.00
(+ tax)
Preview (read now)
Add to my own site
Buy multiple copies
Give this ebook to a friend
Add to my wishlist
Author's page
Publisher's page
Devices
- iPad
- PC
- e-readers with Adobe Digital Editions installed
- Mac
See the full list
Available Devices
X
This book is available for the following devices:
- iPad
- Windows
- Mac
- Sony Reader
- Cool-er Reader
- Nook
- Kobo Reader
- iRiver Story
File Formats
Download: PDF.
You can also read this book online in eb20 format without having to download anything.
You can also read this book online in eb20 format without having to download anything.
Permissions
Printing
Copy/Paste
Read Aloud
Printing
Copy/Paste
Read Aloud
more
This theme editorial for the special issue is a compilation of my considered views on the
state of organizational technology riskmanagement and related issues being faced by the
nations, enterprises and even individuals today. The modern auditor is a complexly and
eclectically educated and trained person sincemost of the professional audit organizations
expect that an entrant to the profession must possess skills not only in the conventional
aspects of financial systems but also in the eclectic sphere of knowledge related to the
information technology and management, security and forensics, sociology of the enterprise, human perceptions and professional judgement, etc. My objective in this
editorial is tomake these auditors aware about technology risk management, its impact on
the enterprise internal controls and organizational vulnerabilities.
Billions of dollars are spent each year on technology used to protect people, assets
and facilities. International information technology (IT) security standards are
identified and used to select the best technical solution for an organization’s risk and
security problems. Yet security incidents keep occurring daily, and when one hole is
plugged, another one is discovered! The vicious cycle never ends. Despite the
technological benefits brought to security, this is one of the drawbacks technology
brings to risk management and security. The impact that technology has on risk and
security is exacerbated by the convergence of IT into the physical security space where
the internal controls of an organization are impacted in areas such as risk management,
physical security, IT security and safety. Access control systems and video
surveillance are now computerized and integrated with other business systems such as
human resources (HR). Technology and security have been converging for decades
directly impacting risk management functions throughout the organization. At this
point of the convergence trend, technology can bring new capabilities and
vulnerabilities to physical security and risk management. This trend began to be
noticed in the 1990s. Five star hotels started replacing their mortise locks on guest
rooms with magnetic card readers. Today, we have access control systems, digital
video cameras and smart cards that have become a ubiquitous part of our life.
A number of factors are causing a paradigm shift in risk and security philosophy.
Including the rapid evolution of the threat matrix with an increased understanding of
the concept of “asymmetric” threat coupled with a growing realization of the
significant operational inter-dependencies between IT and the various physical
assets/processes they support (at the system, enterprise, and critical infrastructure
levels). This shift is being driven by the “convergence” of IT security methods with
those of the more traditional physical security methods. The impact is being felt
throughout the community, but is perhaps currently most evident at the risk
management or governance level.
This editorial is to serve as an introduction into the topic of convergence within
security space. To understand the impact technology has on risk, it is important to
understand the dynamics involved when technology is added into the physical security
paradigm. We need to understand the difference between static and dynamic security
systems. We need to also take into consideration the inherent weaknesses in any
security system. Finally, and most importantly, we need to understand the impact that
technology has on risk and security internal controls.
Nature of security systems
Security systems can be classified into one of two categories, static or dynamic.
Dynamic systems are just what the words say; they are adaptable, flexible, resilient,
and elastic. They rely less on technology and more on people. Dynamic systems do not
need additional programming and new costs each time the threat and situations
change. They are also the most expensive. People are not cheap, yet it has been proven
time and time again, you get what you pay for. Technology should be viewed as
an enabler to dynamic systems instead of a replacement. Static security systems, as the
name implies, can be characterized as being rigid, difficult to modify and inflexible. A concrete barrier or gate once installed can change little to defeat changing threats.
The same holds true for technology. Software and hardware upgrades come out
periodically, yet the threat is constantly changing. Look at the vicious cycle of hackers
and IT security software. Each time a new version of a tool is made available for sale,
hackers find and exploit the weaknesses. The software companies fix the weaknesses,
and the hackers find new ones. The cycle never ends. Technology cannot take the
context of a threat situation and make decisions. People can. Yet many organizations
spend millions of dollars on technology-based security solutions, only to discover they
still have vulnerabilities. Used properly, technology does close vulnerability gaps; by
enabling people to do their jobs more effectively in protecting assets. How many
terrorists or criminals are located and captured by technology alone. It is the people
that use the technology that protect us against these threats.
Design of security system
All security systems have weaknesses. When technology is introduced into a security
system, its weaknesses are much more difficult to discover and protect. User interfaces
hide the complexity and vulnerabilities of technology security solutions. Technology
promises to enable, yet physical security is designed to deter. Designing security
systems requires testing against a number of threats to find new vulnerabilities. The
testing is performed each time a new component is installed and before the threat
strikes. Thus the security solution’s weaknesses are discovered (what made them fail)
and adjustments are made accordingly to protect those weaknesses. We are also less
prone to fully test complex systems to determine their weaknesses resulting in insecure
systems that may be more vulnerable because of the new component. For instance,
over the last few hundred years, prisoners sit in their cells all day, every day, using
plastic utensils to destroy door hinges, locks and anything else that they can find.
They have the time and opportunity to discover and attempt to defeat the protection
against abuse in all prison cell components. Modern prison cell construction utilizes
pre-cast concrete, doors with minimum clearances and tempered steel construction.
The same holds true in with technology. The difference is that unlike the prison cells
which can be inspected daily for tampering, unauthorized tampering with technology
(hacking) is much more difficult to discover and defend against. User interfaces
designed for ease of end-user use, hide complex systems underneath. These systems
have vulnerabilities that most organizations do not and many times cannot detect.
Testing for vulnerabilities in technology based security solutions is minimal at best.
Consider the testing done on a bullet-proof vest. The prototypes and production units
are initially tested in labs replicating real-world conditions. They are also tested by
actual use in the field. On the other hand, when a new technological tool is developed, it
is tested in even the client’s labs. Very few end users continue to test once the solution
is implemented. This reduction in the field-testing gives the opportunity to exploit
vulnerabilities unknown to the client. Security systems can also fail at the edges.
The edges are where different security system components meet each other.
Previously published in: Managerial Auditing Journal, Volume 20, Number 6, 2005
Emerald Group Publishing Limited; July 2005
81 pages; ISBN 9781845443429
Read online, or download in secure PDF format
81 pages; ISBN 9781845443429
Read online, or download in secure PDF format