The Leading eBooks Store Online
for Kindle Fire, Apple, Android, Nook, Kobo, PC, Mac, Sony Reader...
Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit
- iPad
- PC
- e-readers with Adobe Digital Editions installed
- Mac
This book is available for the following devices:
- iPad
- Windows
- Mac
- Sony Reader
- Cool-er Reader
- Nook
- Kobo Reader
- iRiver Story
Printing
Copy/Paste
Read Aloud
today, but that regard is not universal, nor has an adequate volume of literature
supported it. This study provides a detailed examination of certain principal, often
distinctive, aspects of Irenaeus' pneumatology. In contrast to those who have
suggested Irenaeus held a weak conception of the person and work of the Holy Spirit,
Anthony Briggman demonstrates that Irenaeus combined Second Temple Jewishtraditions
of the spirit with New Testament theology to produce the most complex
Jewish-Christian pneumatology of the early church. In so doing, Irenaeus moved
beyond his contemporaries by being the first author, following the New Testament
writings, to construct a theological account in whichbinitarian logic did not
diminish either the identity or activity of the Holy Spirit. That is to say, he was
the first to support his Trinitarian convictions by means of Trinitarian
logic.Briggman advances the narrative that locates early Christian pneumatologies in
the context of Jewish traditions regarding the spirit. In particular, he argues that
the appropriation and repudiation of Second Temple Jewish forms of thought explain
three moments in the development of Christian theology. First, the existence of a
rudimentary pneumatology correlating to the earliest stage of Trinitarian theology
in which a Trinitarian confession is accompanied by binitarian orientation/logic,
suchas in the thought of Justin Martyr. Second, the development of a sophisticated
pneumatology correlating to a mature second century Trinitarian theology in which a
Trinitarian confession is accompanied by Trinitarian logic. This second moment is
visible in Irenaeus' thought, which eschewed Jewishtraditions that often hindered
theological accounts of his near contemporaries, such as Justin, while adopting and
adapting Jewish traditions that enabled him to strengthen and clarify his own
understanding of the Holy Spirit. Third, the return to a rudimentary account of the
Spirit at the turn of the third century when theologians such as Tertullian, Origen,
and Novatian repudiated Jewish traditions integral to Irenaeus' account of the Holy
Spirit.
less